Articles
Denver Housing Appreciation Comparison: SFH vs. Condos (1990-2025)
Dec 30, 2025
Back to blogs
Denver Housing Appreciation Comparison: SFH vs. Condos (1990-2025)
The analysis of Denver's housing market over the past 25–35 years reveals a consistent pattern: Single-Family Homes (SFH) have significantly outperformed Condominiums and Townhomes in terms of raw annual appreciation. This long-term trend is driven by the scarcity of land and the specific ways each asset class reacts to economic booms and busts.
Key Performance Indicators (1990–2025 Average)
Across three decades of growth, two major recessions, and a massive housing boom, SFH has delivered a higher average annual growth rate (AAA).
Asset Class | Estimated Average Annual Appreciation (AAA) | Volatility |
|---|---|---|
Single-Family Homes (SFH) | 5.5% to 6.5% | Moderate |
Condominiums / Townhomes | 4.5% to 5.5% | High |
Performance Across Economic Cycles
The difference in performance is most visible when examining how each segment handles periods of extreme stress and extreme growth.
1. The 2008 Great Financial Crisis (GFC)
The GFC and subsequent recovery highlighted the stability premium of SFH.
SFH Reaction: Prices dropped significantly but tended to recover faster due to sustained demand for detached homes, especially from families. SFH values often found their floor sooner.
Condo Reaction: Condos and Townhomes, particularly in dense urban areas, often experienced deeper and more prolonged price corrections. The recovery was typically slower, as buyer demand for entry-level housing was weaker immediately after the GFC.
2. The 2020–2022 Pandemic Boom
This period of unprecedented growth saw both asset classes appreciate rapidly, but SFH still commanded the lead.
SFH Reaction: Demand for space, yards, and privacy drove SFH appreciation to historic highs (often exceeding 20% year-over-year in 2021).
Condo Reaction: Condos also saw massive growth, fueled by low interest rates and investors, but the lack of private outdoor space and the desire for social distancing capped their maximum growth potential relative to detached homes.
Fundamental Drivers of SFH Outperformance
The long-term gap in appreciation is not random; it is rooted in structural economic factors specific to the Denver Metro area.
1. Land Value (Scarcity)
SFHs appreciate primarily due to the increasing value of the land they sit on, not just the structure itself. As the Denver Metro area's geographical boundaries become constrained by mountains and urbanization, the scarcity of developable land drives up the value of existing SFH lots. Condos, by contrast, are valued primarily by the unit's square footage and finishes, as the land value is divided among hundreds of owners.
2. Supply Dynamics
It is significantly easier and faster to build new Condominiums and apartments (vertical construction) than to build new detached SFH subdivisions, especially within established suburbs. This continuous potential for new condo supply tends to cap their appreciation ceiling over the long run.
3. Homeowner Association (HOA) Premiums
While HOAs maintain common areas, the fees and any subsequent special assessments can act as a financial drag on condo values, particularly compared to SFH, where maintenance costs are more directly controllable by the owner.
Conclusion for Investors
The historical data confirms that SFH is the superior long-term appreciation play in the Denver Metro, driven by land scarcity and demand for privacy. Condos offer a lower barrier to entry and are excellent for cash flow and first-time buyers, but their long-term wealth creation, based purely on appreciation, is generally lower than that of detached homes.
Sources
[Denver Metro Association of Realtors Historical Data Reports, 1990-2025]
[S&P CoreLogic Case-Shiller Home Price Indices: Denver]
[Colorado Housing and Finance Authority (CHFA) Market Analysis]
written by
Cody Bergan

